Articles

Finality vs Fairness: the high threshold for resisting enforcement of arbitral awards in Singapore

The principle of finality is a cornerstone of international arbitration. Parties who submit disputes to arbitration expect the resulting award to be binding and enforceable, with only limited opportunities for judicial intervention. Courts rarely revisit an award’s merits, intervening only for exceptional circumstances like serious breaches of natural justice, exceeded mandates, or public policy violations. […]

Finality vs Fairness: the high threshold for resisting enforcement of arbitral awards in Singapore Read More »

Articles

Natural Justice Challenges in Arbitration: Singapore High Court reaffirms a high threshold for intervention

The principle of natural justice occupies a central place in international arbitration, safeguarding procedural fairness and ensuring parties have a reasonable opportunity to present their cases. At the same time, courts have consistently maintained that challenges to arbitral awards on natural justice grounds will only succeed in exceptional circumstances. This position was recently reaffirmed by

Natural Justice Challenges in Arbitration: Singapore High Court reaffirms a high threshold for intervention Read More »

Articles

Arbitration Beyond the Award: settlement agreements and enforcement challenges

International arbitration does not always end with the issuance of an arbitral award. Parties often enter post-award settlement agreements regulating how awards will be satisfied, particularly through structured payment arrangements or negotiated enforcement terms. While these agreements may encourage compliance and avoid immediate enforcement proceedings, they can also create new disputes where a party alleges

Arbitration Beyond the Award: settlement agreements and enforcement challenges Read More »

Articles

Can Annulled Arbitral Awards Still Be Enforced? A comparative look at major jurisdictions

The annulment of an arbitral award at the seat of arbitration has traditionally been regarded as a major impediment to its enforcement abroad. In practice, however, the position is far from absolute. International arbitration continues to reveal divergent judicial approaches to annulled awards, reflecting the tension between territorial control by national courts and the transnational

Can Annulled Arbitral Awards Still Be Enforced? A comparative look at major jurisdictions Read More »

Articles

Setting Aside Arbitral Awards on Public Policy Grounds: Brief Insights from AT v. QC

In modern cross-border investment transactions, parties often structure their agreements to accommodate regulatory restrictions and commercial risks. However, disputes may arise where parties later disagree on the legal effect of those arrangements, particularly where foreign regulatory approvals and payment structures are involved. Such disputes frequently test the extent to which courts may interfere with arbitral

Setting Aside Arbitral Awards on Public Policy Grounds: Brief Insights from AT v. QC Read More »

Articles